Legal Opinion

Ames v. Adams

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 29, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Philbrooic, A. R. J.

This action is brought under the provisions of Secs. 9 and 10 of R. S., Chap. 92, commonly known to the legal profession as Lord Campbell’s Act, which by the former section provides that “Whenever the death of a person shall be caused by wrongful act, neglect or default, and the act, neglect or default is such as would, if death had not ensued, have entitled the party injured to maintain an action and recover damages in respect thereof, then, and in every such case, the person who, or the corporation which, would have been liable, if death had not ensued, shall be liable…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. WylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Matz v. Chicago & A. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Farrington v. StoddardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
  2. Chase v. Inhabitants of LitchfieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1936
  3. Calvert v. CorthellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  4. Angela M. Smith, Personal Representatives of the Estate of Peter A. Smith v. John R. HensonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025
  5. Marsh v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API