Legal Opinion

Edward J. Farrell v. James P. Donovan

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 25, 1956No. 13220_1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant, broker in a real estate transaction, sued both purchasers and sellers for loss of his commission resulting from their cancellation of the contract. The District Court granted appellees’ motions to dismiss the complaint. This action was correct: as to the sellers, on venue grounds, since they are residents of Maryland and were served with process there; as to the purchasers, for lack of a claim upon which relief could be granted, since a purchaser is not accountable to a broker for commission, absent an understanding to that effect, Giovannoni v. Waple & James, Inc., 1939, 70…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Continental Oil Co. v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. Giovannoni v. Waple & James, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Amalgamated Association Of Street, Electric Railway And Motor Coach Employees Of America, Afl v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API