Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Vann

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 20, 1927No. 4 Div. 271PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

When a statement in writing of the debt and lawful charges claimed by the purchaser at foreclosure sale of lands, or his vendee, is furnished to a proposed re-demptioner, pursuant to Code, § 10144, showing a claim for permanent improvements on the property, and the proposed redemptioner fails or refuses to appoint a referee and give notice of his disagreement to the claim and the name of his referee, pursuant to Code, § 10153, he must pay the value put upon the improvements by the holder of the title subject to redemption. Code, § 10154.

A compulsory arbitration is provided, subject to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Slaughter v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Prichard v. SweeneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  3. Smith v. JackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dorrough v. BarnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Ewing v. First Nat. Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Rodgers v. StahmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. Ragland v. Board of Missions for Freedmen of the Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Stevenson v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API