Legal Opinion

Rodgers v. Stahmer

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 17, 1938No. 6 Div. 139PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

The provisions of our statutes are quite explicit in defining the terms and conditions upon which the statutory right of redemption shall be exercised, and when the party entitled to redeem may go into equity to enforce such right.

He must “pay or tender to the purchaser or his vendee the purchase money; with interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum thereon, and all other lawful charges, with legal interest.” Section 10145, Code 1923.

If the party entitled to redeem does not 'know the amount to be tendered, a written demand may be made upon the purchaser or his vendee for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kelly v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Slaughter v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Johnson v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  4. Johnson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Dorrough v. BarnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rhoden v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Garvich v. Associates Financial Services Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Watts v. Rudulph Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  4. Stevenson v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  5. Garrett v. Federal Land Bank of New OrleansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API