Sidney Novelty Co. v. Hanlon
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action to recover for merchandise sold, brought to the Superior Court in Fairfield County where successive defenses by way of counterclaim were adjudged insufficient on demurrer (.Rorabaak and Shumway, Js.), and the cause was afterward tried to the court, Gteorge W. Wheeler, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff, and appeal by the defendants.
1Opinion of the CourtPrentice, J.
In this action, to recover upon the common counts and a bill of particulars, the defendants filed a counterclaim. The court sustained a demurrer thereto and granted leave to amend. An amended counterclaim for the same cause of action as the former was thereupon filed. The plaintiff again demurred. Thereupon the attorneys for the defendants consented that the demurrer should he sustained without argument, and in pursuance of such consent the same was sustained. No further pleadings were attempted to be filed' until at the time of the trial, about six months later. After the evidence was all in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Farrell v. Waterbury Horse R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
- Duffee v. MansfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Goodrich v. StantonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- Mitchell v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cannavo Enterprises, Inc. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Royce v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Shaw v. SpelkeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Good Humor Corp. v. RicciutiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- R. A. Sherman's Sons Co. v. Industrial & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.