Legal Opinion

Siravo v. AAA Trucking Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 5, 1982No. 2129PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge:

This is a negligence action in which appellant contends that appellee’s evidence below was contrary to the “incontrovertible physical facts” doctrine of Lessig v. Reading Transit & Light Co., 270 Pa. 299, 113 A. 381 (1921). Since we conclude that appellant’s facts were neither evidence nor *219“incontrovertible”, we have no occasion to consider the applicability of the aforesaid doctrine and affirm.

The basic facts are not disputed. Appellee went to a diner at 10th and Russell Streets in Philadelphia on July 8, 1975 and parked his car on the west side of 10th Street. When appellee was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Lessig v. Reading Transit & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Gee v. EberleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Sayward v. DennySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Interstate Cemetery Co. AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Concorde Investments, Inc. v. GallagherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. McFarlane v. HickmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Hoch v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API