Siravo v. AAA Trucking Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
PRICE, Judge:
This is a negligence action in which appellant contends that appellee’s evidence below was contrary to the “incontrovertible physical facts” doctrine of Lessig v. Reading Transit & Light Co., 270 Pa. 299, 113 A. 381 (1921). Since we conclude that appellant’s facts were neither evidence nor *219“incontrovertible”, we have no occasion to consider the applicability of the aforesaid doctrine and affirm.
The basic facts are not disputed. Appellee went to a diner at 10th and Russell Streets in Philadelphia on July 8, 1975 and parked his car on the west side of 10th Street. When appellee was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Lessig v. Reading Transit & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Gee v. EberleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Sayward v. DennySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Interstate Cemetery Co. AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Concorde Investments, Inc. v. GallagherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- McFarlane v. HickmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Hoch v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.