Legal Opinion

Amador v. Wolfe

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided July 17, 2020No. 5:17-cv-00683Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION GREGORIO AMADOR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 5:17-cv-683-JKP BRIAN WOLFE, et al., Defendants. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Before the Court are motions for summary judgment filed by Defendants Laurence Diamond (“Diamond”) (ECF No. 80) and Brian Wolfe (“Wolfe”) and Manuel Herrera (“Herrera”) (ECF No. 81). Plaintiffs responded to the motions and Defendants replied (ECF Nos. 83, 84, 86, 87). Pursuant to Local Rule CV-7(h), the Court finds these matters suitable for disposition without a hearing.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API