Legal Opinion

Summerville v. Gillespie

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1947PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINSLOW, J. (Pro Tempore)

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from a collision between an auto mobile in which respondent was riding and a truck operated by one A. A. Fausett and owned by Robert Gillespie, doing business as Central Oregon Fuel Co., the appellant herein. From a judgment in favor of respondent, appellant prosecutes this appeal.

There are several assignments of error, but, by virtue of the conclusion we have reached, it will be necessary to consider only one thereof — appellant’s motion for a directed verdict. By this motion appellant raises the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Riley v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Judson v. Bee Hive Auto Service Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1930
  3. West v. KernOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Bunnell v. PareliusOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Houston v. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wiebe v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. White v. KELLER ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Hopfer v. StaudtOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Buck Witt v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  5. Blevins v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API