Legal Opinion

Beauchamp v. Tennel

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 10, 1809PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION of the Court, by

Ch. J. Bibb.

— Beau-champ declared against Tennel, that in consideration of *442a reasonable compensation to be made by tbe plaintiff, he did assume and faithfully promise to receive 270Q pounds of pot metal, the property cf the plaintiff, at Geneva and deliver the same at M’Kee’s port ; avers that he did receive the said pot metal and failed to deliver the same at M’Kee’s port, agreeable to his undertaking, by reason whereof the plaintiff lost the said 2700 pounds of pot metal, to his damage £. 100; the defendant pleaded non assumpsit.

A bill of exceptions to the opinion of…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Henderson Cotton Manufacturing Co. v. Lowell Machine ShopsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  2. Cox v. MondayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  3. McNear v. RobersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Vinson's Ex'xs v. Maynard, Etc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  5. Cassell's Heirs v. Gazello's Ex'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API