Legal Opinion

Buchanan Bros. v. Smith

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 7, 1932PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

The final decree in this case should be affirmed on the authority of Lake Mabel Development Corp. v. Bird, 99 Fla. 253, 126 Sou. Rep. 356; Day v. Weadock, 101 Fla. 333, 134 Sou. Rep. 525, holding that a final decree in equity will be affirmed where entire ease shows errors, if any, in pleading or procedure, have not resulted in a miscarriage of justice.

But said decree should be modified so as to divide the costs and impose such costs, both in the lower court and in this court, equally upon complainants and defendants it appearing that neither of the adverse parties has been diligent in…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lake Mabel Development Corp. v. BirdSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. Day Et Ux. v. WeadockSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. Chandler v. ShermanSupreme Court of Florida · 1877

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gaulden v. KirkSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  2. State Ex Rel. Klemm v. BaskinSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. State Ex Rel. Aldrich v. MitchellSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  4. State Ex Rel. East Side Bank v. HollowaySupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  5. Charles Sales Corp. v. MaxwellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API