Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hoffman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 1987No. 772PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by the Commonwealth from the pretrial court’s grant of appellee’s motion to suppress a certain recorded conversation and the transcript thereof. Finding the suppression court’s reliance upon Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201, 84 S.Ct. 1199, 12 L.Ed.2d 246 (1964), and its progeny to be misplaced, we reverse the order of the suppression court and remand for further proceedings.

We initially note that the Commonwealth has set forth in its statement of jurisdiction that the entry of the suppression order in question substantially handicapped the prosecution, thereby properly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Maine v. MoultonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Kuhlmann v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JamesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. ElliottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. SlovikoskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. DubinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. WhitingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API