Legal Opinion

Sixkiller v. Weete

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 15, 1935No. 20106PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBayless, J.

Chas. D. Sixkiller et al., plaintiffs in error, were defendants in the trial court, and appeal from a judgment in, favor of E. E. Weete and Kathryn G. Weete, husband and wife, rendered by the district court of TYTsa county, Okla. We will refer to Sixkil’er et al., as defendants, and to the husband and wife by name.

In order to have a proper understanding of this appeal, it is best to make a short statement of the history of (he case.

The land involved herein was selected as a part of the allotment of Martin Sixkiller, a Cherokee Indian of three-eighths blood, after his death. Martin Sixkiller…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Cressler v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Stewart v. KeyesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Henry v. GregoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Union Trust Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mercer v. McKeelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Van Meter v. FieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. Ludeman v. ArmbrusterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  4. Crawford v. CarterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Priddy v. MasseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API