Legal Opinion

Hawk v. Moore

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 21, 1959No. 4 Div. 972PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

Appellee Moore filed a bill to set aside a mortgage foreclosure by appellant Hawk on the ground that the mortgage debt had been fully paid or that the price realized at the foreclosure sale was so grossly inadequate that he should be permitted to redeem.

On first appeal, 260 Ala. 228, 69 So.2d 419, 420, we held that in the absence of unusual circumstances, the right to dis-affirm the foreclosure sale was barred in two years, and this bill was filed four years after the foreclosure. We also found “the evidence so indefinite and uncertain that we deem it best to remand the cause…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Drum & Ezekiel v. BryanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  2. Alexander v. HicksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  3. Lee v. GainesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Hawk v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  5. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. West Blocton Sav. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moore v. HawkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  2. Robino v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API