Legal Opinion

Moore v. Hawk

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1960No. 4 Div. 21PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STAKELY, Justice.

William. Mixon Moore (appellant) filed a bill in equity to set aside a mortgage foreclosure by Marlon Hawk (appellee) on the ground that the mortgage debt had been fully paid or that the price realized át the foreclosure sale was so grossly Inadequate that he should be permitted to redeem.. The case came here for the first time on appeal and this court found that “the evi*686dence is so indefinite and uncertain that we deem it best to remand the cause so that testimony in regard to this question of payment may be made more certain and satisfactory.” Hawk v. Moore, 260 Ala. 228,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Caples v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. O'Rear v. O'RearSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Lathem v. LeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  4. Alexander v. LetsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  5. Chadwick v. Town of HammondvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matthews v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. Ex parte HelblingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. Malone v. State ex rel. GallionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  4. Carter v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  5. Daniel v. HagginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API