Gomez, Richard v. State

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice O’NEILL.

Appellant Richard Gomez appeals his conviction for indecency with a child. After finding appellant guilty, the trial court assessed punishment at twelve years’ confinement. In a single point of error, appellant contends he received ineffective assistance of counsel. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

The grand jury indicted appellant for indecency with a child, K.L., by causing contact between the child’s hand and appellant’s genitals. K.L. is appellant’s girlfriend’s twelve-year-old daughter. Appellant pleaded nolo contendere to…