Legal Opinion
B.K. ex rel. Kroupa v. 4-H
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided July 12, 2012No. CIV. 12-4046-KESPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION IN PART
KAREN E. SCHREIER, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff, B.K., a minor, through Greg Kroupa, her father and guardian ad litem, brought suit against defendants, 4-H, Peter Nielson, Rod Geppert, John Does, and Mary Does1 in their individual and official capacities, alleging violations of her First, Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 after she was banned from participating in 4-H exhibition shows. Defendants move to dismiss B.K’s claims against 4-H and…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Greg Kroupa v. Peter NielsenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Issaenko v. University of MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Temple v. Cleve Her Many HorsesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2016
- Greg Kroupa v. Peter NielsenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Hodges v. South Dakota School of Mines and TechnologyDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2022