Legal Opinion

Jackson v. General Motors Acceptance Corporation

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1958No. 2134PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

Appellant brought this suit seeking both compensatory and punitive damages for an alleged unlawful repossession of his automobile by appellee. At the conclusion of his evidence the court directed a verdict for appellee and this appeal followed.

In March 1955 appellant purchased a new car from a local dealer under a conditional sales contract. The terms of the agreement provided that appellant was to make a total down payment of $1,170.20 at the time of signing, an additional payment of $86.26 on May 1, and the balance in monthly installments of $61.21 commencing on May…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wardman-Justice Motors, Inc. v. PetrieCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1930
  2. Pelton v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Luke v. Mercantile Acceptance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Whittingham v. OwenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1890

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Rieser v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  3. Franklin Inv. Co., Inc. v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Edward B. FroelichCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1959
  5. Columbia Finance Company v. WorthyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API