Legal Opinion

General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Edward B. Froelich

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 3, 1959No. 15145_1PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAHY, Circuit Judge.

The questions are whether, in a jury trial for compensatory and punitive damages for the wrongful repossession of an automobile, resulting in recovery by plaintiff of $150 compensatory and $2,500 punitive damages, (1) prejudicial evidence was erroneously admitted and (2) the case was one for the jury on the issue of punitive damages. 1(1) The question of evidence turns on the reception over defendant’s objection of certain interoffice .memo-randa. We assume for present purposes that these memoranda were sufficiently privileged to bar their admissibility on the libel count…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PrenticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Wardman-Justice Motors, Inc. v. PetrieCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1930
  3. Columbia Finance Company v. WorthyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Jackson v. General Motors Acceptance CorporationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jung Ja Malandris v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  2. Wills v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1961
  3. John W. Skeels v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corporation v. Estelle A. Skeels, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
  4. Robinson v. SariskyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Remeikis v. Boss & Phelps, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API