Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided August 30, 2000No. 06-98-00174-CRPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Chief Justice CORNELIUS.

Thomas Taylor appeals his conviction for possession of more than five pounds but less than fifty pounds of marihuana. 1 After the trial court denied Taylor’s motion to suppress, Taylor pleaded guilty. The trial court found Taylor guilty and assessed his punishment, enhanced by a prior felony conviction, at four years’ imprisonment. In three points of error, Taylor contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. 2 Specifically, he contends that the officer (1) lacked probable cause to justify the detention and search; (2)…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Robuck v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
  2. Dickey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  3. Griffin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
  4. Bradshaw v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
  5. Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API