Legal Opinion

McKinley v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 13, 1927No. 6 Div. 814PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

This is an action for damages growing out of an. automobile collision.

The defendants in the original complaint were D. E. McKinley & Bro., a partnership, D. -E. McKinley & Bro., a corporation, D. R. McKinley, doing business as D. E. McKinley & Bro., and D. R. McKinley, individually. By amendment, D. E. McKinley & Bro., a corporation, was stricken from the complaint.

The complaint claims damages of “the defendant,” avers that plaintiff’s automobile was struck, etc., by the automobile truck of the defendant, and avers, fprther, that the injuries and. damage suffered were caused “by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. CarlockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Osborne v. CooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. DuncanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  4. Corona Coal Co. v. HuckelbeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1920

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anderton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  2. Russell v. Praetorians, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Sarber v. HollonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  4. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  5. Cook v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API