Legal Opinion

Sarber v. Hollon

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 29, 1956No. 3 Div. 770PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by H. E. Sarber and Willie Looney Messer, who were defendants in a suit for damages by plaintiff (appellee) suing as the father of Bryant Hollon, a minor, for injuries caused to him by Messer while acting in the line and scope of his authority as the agent, servant or employee “of the defendants”; the complaint alleging that he so negligently operated “defendant’s truck,” etc. See section 118, Title 7, Code.

The suit was tried on counts 4 and 5. They named as defendants “H. E. Sarber, Willie Looney Messer, John Doe, Richard Roe, A. B. Partnership and XYZ Corporation, whose…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Southern Bell Telephone Co. v. FrancisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. AbernathySupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. CarlockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Roth v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. HanbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1910

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Butler v. OlshanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  2. Georgia Cas. and Sur. Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pa. v. DevineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  4. Vulcan Materials Company v. GraceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  5. Gober v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API