Amen v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The primary issues in this appeal are whether statutory eviden-tiary requirements for corroboration of false pretense charges are sufficient to support individual convictions, whether a misdemeanor crime is a lesser included offense in the more serious felony false pretense offense, and whether severance should have been ordered in the trial of the defendants. Having concluded that none of the issues has merit, we affirm.
The Facts
Appellants are either co-owners or salespersons involved in an extended telemarketing scam which operated from Henderson, Nevada, under the name of J & W…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Schaffer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. Martha L. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- Harold S. Cross v. United States of America, John L. Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- People v. FujitaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- United States v. William ClaytonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by19 opinions
- Middleton v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1998
- Lisle v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1997
- Rowland v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- Floyd v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- Tabish v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.