Eastland County v. Chapman
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSpeer, J.
Plaintiff in error moves a correction ■ of the judgment entry in the following particulars: First, so that the costs of the district court may be taxed against defendant in error; and second, that the judgment may allow legal interest upon the $85,557.83 established as a claim to be paid out of the depositors’ guaranty fund. The motion should be granted in so far as it seeks to recover the costs of the district court, since the plaintiff in error has ultimately maintained its right to a recovery (in part) in the district court (Vernon’s Sayles’ Texas Civil Statutes, art. 2035)', but should be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cave v. Mayor of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. ChamblissTexas Supreme Court · 1899
- Houston & Texas C. R. R. Co. v. MuldrowTexas Supreme Court · 1881
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1881
- Hawthorne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Linz v. Eastland CountyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Shaw v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Austin v. Guaranty State Bank of FulbrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Austin v. BurdenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Hall v. EllwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.