Legal Opinion

Koonce v. Arnold

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 15, 1943No. 8 Div. 187PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVINGSTON, Justice.

This appeal is from a decree of the Circuit Court of Lauderdale County, in Equity, entered on March 20, 1942, setting aside a decree pro confesso taken on February 28, 1942.

The cause was submitted here on the merits and motion for writ of mandamus.

Appellant.insists that the lower court erroneously set aside the decree pro confesso because appellee’s motion to that end did not comply with Equity Rule 34, Code of 1940, Title 7, Appendix, page 1079, in that (1) “no proper showing” was made, and (2) the answer filed in connection with the motion was not “full and sufficient,”…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brady v. BradySupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
  2. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  3. Hart v. GreetSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ex Parte FowlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Ex Parte SpearsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Phillips v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1985
  4. Brittain v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. Ex Parte JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API