Legal Opinion

Berndl v. Director General of Railroads

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.

The questions raised in this case relate to the construction and application of sec. 1810, Stats. > Sub. 1 of that section requires every railroad corporation to maintain on both sides of its road, except depot grounds, a sufficient fence to prevent cattle and other domestic animals from going thereon.

Sub. 2 provides:

“Until such fences and cattle-guards shall be duly made every railroad corporation owning or operating any such road shall be liable for all damages done to cattle, horses or other domestic animals, or persons thereon, occasioned * in any manner, in whole or in part, by the want…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Curry v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Quackenbush v. Wisconsin & Minnesota RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Jorgenson v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Ulicke v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Willard v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harter v. DickmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Dean v. EhrhartCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
  3. Dean v. EhrhartCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API