Legal Opinion
State v. Hibl
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided May 26, 2006No. 2004AP2936-CRPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAnn Walsh Bradley, J.
¶ 1. The State of Wisconsin petitions for review of a published court of *599appeals' decision affirming the circuit court's order that suppressed the State's eyewitness identification evidence against the defendant, Brian Hibl.1 The eyewitness, who was initially able to describe Hibl only as a "white male," identified Hibl 17 months later at the courthouse on the day that Hibl's case was scheduled for trial.
¶ 2. The State asserts that the court of appeals incorrectly applied State v. Dubose, 2005 WI 126, ¶ 16, 285 Wis. 2d 143, 699 N.W.2d 582, a case in which this court addressed a police…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. Michael R. LuedtkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. MarteNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Terez Cook v. Brian FosterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- State v. ChenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- Braylon Seifert v. Kay M. Balink, M.D.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.