Bell v. King
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
The bill was filed by a mortgagor against the mortgagee and an assignee thereof; alleged that the mortgage debt was infected with usury; that the mortgagee was the real owner of the mortgage, the transfer merely simulated, and the transferee a mere “dummy,” holding subject to- all the equities between the mortgagor and the mortgagee; that the mortgagor had offered to pay and was ready and willing to pay the sum borrowed, with lawful interest; that the assignee was proceeding to foreclose the mortgage under the power therein; that the indebtedness secured was a part of an account long existing…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wynn v. Tallapoosa County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- de Graffenried v. BreitlingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Ex parte Elyton Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Adams v. SayreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Stein v. McGrathSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rogers v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Bell v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Kelly v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Beasley v. RossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Hylton v. CatheySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.