Legal Opinion

Bell v. King

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 17, 1924No. 6 Div. 8PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The bill was filed by a mortgagor against the mortgagee and an assignee thereof; alleged that the mortgage debt was infected with usury; that the mortgagee was the real owner of the mortgage, the transfer merely simulated, and the transferee a mere “dummy,” holding subject to- all the equities between the mortgagor and the mortgagee; that the mortgagor had offered to pay and was ready and willing to pay the sum borrowed, with lawful interest; that the assignee was proceeding to foreclose the mortgage under the power therein; that the indebtedness secured was a part of an account long existing…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wynn v. Tallapoosa County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. de Graffenried v. BreitlingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Ex parte Elyton Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. Adams v. SayreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  5. Stein v. McGrathSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rogers v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Bell v. KingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Kelly v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Beasley v. RossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Hylton v. CatheySupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API