Legal Opinion

Patterson v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 29, 1952No. 17698PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hawkins, Justice.

1. Extraordinary motions for new trial based on newly discovered evidence are not favored by the law. Where, as in this case, the accused has been convicted, a new trial denied him, and that judgment has been affirmed (Patterson v. State, 206 Ga. 260, 56 S. E. 2d, 501, 339 U. S. 916, 70 Sup. Ct. 563, 94 L. ed. 1341), an extraordinary motion for new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge, and a refusal to grant the motion will not be reversed unless his discretion is abused. If it is not reasonably apparent to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Keener v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
  2. Doyal v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  3. Hudgins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847
  4. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  5. Dill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Williams v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Proctor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  3. Bradley v. BradleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  4. Cobb v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  5. Fields v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API