Legal Opinion

Schomber v. Prudential Ins. Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 9, 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

214 N.J. Super. 309 (1986)

518 A.2d 1138

RUTH A. SCHOMBER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF WALTER B. SCHOMBER, PLAINTIFF,

v.

PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Gloucester County.

Decided October 9, 1986.

Eugene P. Chell, Woodbury, for plaintiff.

John P. Montemurro, Haddonfield, for defendant (Tomlin, Clark & Hopkin, attorneys).

HOLSTON, J.S.C.

This case comes before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment by plaintiff and defendant. There is no dispute of the facts which are, that on October 20, 1983, decedent, Walter B. Schomber,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Brewer v. PorchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  2. Westchester Fire Ins. Co. v. Continental Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  3. Perez v. Pantasote, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. AMN, Inc. v. Township of South Brunswick Rent Leveling BoardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  5. Westchester Fire Insurance v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ingraham v. Travelers CompaniesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  2. Kordell v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  3. Jusino v. LapentaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API