State v. McMaster
Oregon Supreme Court
1Concurrence · TongueTongue, J.
I concur in the result of the majority opinion that the rights of the parents should not be severed in the child involved in this case. I do not agree, however, with the reasoning by the majority and, in particular, in the holding that ORS 419.523 (2) (a) is a valid and constitutional statute.
I agree that the facts of this case, as reviewed by the majority, illustrate one of the serious social problems of our times. Indeed, this is a particularly tragic case and one calling for the wisdom of a twentieth century Solomon. Perhaps that ancient decree would persuade this mother to yield to the…
Also in this document: Concurrence · McAllister.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Giaccio v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Cline v. Frink Dairy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- A. B. Small Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- State v. HodgesOregon Supreme Court · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.