City of Haltom City v. Aurell

OPINION

TERRIE LIVINGSTON, Chief Justice.

In this interlocutory appeal,1 appellant City of Haltom City (the City) appeals the trial court’s order denying its motion for summary judgment concerning the claims brought by appellees, whom we have listed above. In five issues, the City argues that the trial court does not have jurisdiction over appellees’ claims because the City’s immunity has not been waived. We reverse the trial court’s order denying the City’s motion for summary judgment, and we render a judgment dismissing appel-lees’ lawsuit against the City with prejudice.

Background Facts

Over…