State v. Holland
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Neill
Herbert Holland developed a cost-effective process to clean oil-contaminated bilge water. The State of Texas, seeking to abate oil pollution in its coastal waters, contracted with, and paid more than $160,000 to, Holland’s companies for assistance in designing and constructing filtration units along the Texas Gulf Coast. Holland later received a patent on the decontamination process and began demanding additional payments as patent royalties. When the State refused to pay, Holland filed this suit claiming the State’s unauthorized use of his patented technology constituted a taking under…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Bland Independent School District v. BlueTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. ShumakeTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- General Services Commission v. Little-Tex Insulation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. Steck Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by545 opinions
- Texas a & M University System v. KoseogluTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Texas Parks & Wildlife Department v. Sawyer TrustTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- Harris County Hospital District v. Tomball Regional HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- City of Houston v. Petroleum Traders Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
- City of Farmers Branch v. Ramos, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
540 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.