Celerina Pelea v. R. James Nicholson
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1Opinion of the Court
STEINBERG, Chief Judge:
In a single-judge order dated March 25, 2003, the Court ordered vacated a May 2, 2001, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) that concluded that Celerina Pelea (the appellant) did not meet the eligibility requirements for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefits because service in the U.S. Armed Forces by her deceased husband, Bibiano Pelea, could not be verified (Record (R.)' at 1-6); the Court initially ordered the matter remanded for readjudication in light of the enactment of the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (VCAA), Pub.L. No. 106—…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Stegall v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998
- Caluza v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Benjamin F. Kent v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
- Pelea v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Celerina Pelea v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
- Celerina Pelea v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006