Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Wright

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 2017No. 7200 S-15917Published

1ConcurrenceBolger, Justice

I agree with the court’s opinion that the State did not violate Sean Wright’s right to a speedy trial. But I disagree with the court’s conclusion that a prosecutor’s information is a formal charge sufficient to initiate a felony prosecution within the meaning of this constitutional guarantee. The Alaska Constitution requires a grand jury indictment to initiate a felony prosecution. Therefore, until the defendant has been arrested or indicted, we should apply the due process test to assess preindictment delay.

A. Alaska Law Requires The Grand Jury To Return An Indictment To Initiate Felony…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. People v. TaranovichNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. Loud HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API