McVicker v. Campanini
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, New York county.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.
The attachment in question was procured upon the affidavit of the son of the plaintiff. He states in his aflldavit that he is the son of the plaintiff, and that he is acquainted with and has knowledge of the facts hereinafter set forth, and then alleges the facts upon which the attachment was granted. A motion to vacate the attachment was made upon the *578papers upon which it was granted,- based solely upon the ground that the affiant did not state the grounds of his knowledge and the sources of his belief. This motion was granted, and from the order thereupon entered this appeal is taken. The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Tim v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hoormann v. Climax Cycle Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Hoormann v. Climax Cycle Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Hoorman v. Climax Cycle Co.New York Supreme Court · 1896
- Nevada Bank v. CreganNew York Supreme Court · 1896