Legal Opinion
Nevada Bank v. Cregan
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Motion to vacate attachment on the original papers.
1Opinion of the CourtPbyob, J.
The defendant Cregan moves to vacate the attachment against him, because, among other reasons, of the insufficiency of the affidavit on which the warrant issued.
The action is for the wrongful conversion of $20,000; and the ground of attachment that the defendant “ is about to assign and dispose of his property with intent to defraud creditors.”
To authorize the attachment it was incumbent upon plaintiffs to “ show to the satisfaction of the judge granting the same ” that the alleged cause of áction exists against the defendant, and that he was about to dispose of his property with fraudulent…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Steuben County Bank v. . AlbergerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Ladenburg v. Commercial BankNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- Buell v. . Van CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Smith v. LuceNew York Supreme Court · 1835
- Trow's Printing & Bookbinding Co. v. HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hoorman v. Climax Cycle Co.New York Supreme Court · 1896