Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Till Derr v. Thomas Swarek

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 9, 2014No. 13-60904Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partW. Eugene Davis, Circuit Judge

I agree with my colleagues in the majority as to the conclusions set forth in Part I of their opinion. One litigant’s initiation of a parallel lawsuit in a foreign country while a domestic lawsuit remains pending is not a basis on which a district court may deny comity to the resulting foreign judgment.1 I disagree, however, with Part III of the majority’s opinion. I therefore do not reach the difficult question of first impression under Mississippi law addressed in the majority’s Part II.2

As explained below, even if the Swareks’ voluntary dismissal of their contract claim “with prejudice”…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Hilton v. GuyotSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Laker Airways Ltd. v. Sabena, Belgian World AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  5. Freeman v. Texas Department of Criminal JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API