Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. Ayers
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 30, 2006No. CIV. F-90-363-OWWPPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Final Memorandum Decision and Order Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Granting in Part Certifí-cate of Appealability
WANGER, District Judge.
Petitioner Michael Allen Hamilton (“Hamilton”) first appeared in federal court June 12, 1990, requesting a stay of execution and appointment of counsel. Hamilton filed his petition for writ of habe-as corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 December 3, 1991, and amended his petition January 11, 1993. Hamilton was ordered to exhaust state remedies March 18, 1993, and his second state habeas petition was filed in July, 1994. After informal briefing, the…
2Cases cited141 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hamilton v. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- (DP) Catlin v. DavisDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Hamilton v. AyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- State v. RizzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011