Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Ayers

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 18, 2009No. 06-99008PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:

Michael Allen Hamilton, a California death row inmate, appeals from the district court’s denial of his pre-AEDPA petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging his 1982 conviction and death penalty sentence for multiple counts of first-degree murder. We deny Hamilton’s claims for relief as to the guilt phase. However, we conclude that Hamilton’s trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective at the penalty phase for failing to investigate and present to the jury the wealth of classic mitigating evidence that was available to him. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. State v. Neyland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Sivak v. HardisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Cary Williams v. Timothy FilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Michael Apelt v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. State v. RizzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API