Legal Opinion

Abdullah v. Secretary of Public Safety

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 3, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

‘Abdullah’s G. L. c. 211, § 3, petition requested that the single justice review a decision of the Appeals Court ordering the entry of judgment for the defendants in his underlying case against them, on the ground of qualified immunity. See ‘Abdullah v. Secretary of Pub. Safety, 63 Mass. App. Ct. 1117 (2005). His petition for rehearing was denied by the Appeals Court. ‘Abdullah could have sought, but did not seek, leave to obtain further appellate review. Mass. R. A. P. 27.1, as amended, 426 Mass. 1602 (1998). Relief pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, is not available where the petitioner can…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Votta v. Police DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  2. Lanoue v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. Scott v. District Attorney for the Norfolk DistrictMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chandra v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  2. Chawla v. Appeals CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API