Williams v. Craig & Dawson Coal Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Webster District Court. — Hon. Chas. E. Albrook, Judge. Action for damages resulted in judgment against it, from which it appeals. —
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, C. J.
The defendant operated a coal mine by the room and pillar system. The plaintiff had been employed in it six or seven years, and had been a miner much longer. The particular entry extended several hundred feet from the bottom of the shaft, and Arch and Joseph Hays were driving it further to the east. The track had been laid to within about twenty feet of the face of the coal, the end of the entry as then driven. There was a cross-cut about thirty or thirty-five feet back where plaintiff had worked with the mine foreman a couple of hours the night previous, putting in timber. In the morning…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Oleson v. Maple Grove Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- Wahlquist v. Maple Grove Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Hardy v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Lammey v. Center Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Potter v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wittrock v. NewcomSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
- Rolvaag v. DonovanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- In Re Application of AndersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Holmes v. Bloomfield Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917