Legal Opinion

Whitney v. Bohlen

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1895PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Second District; — heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Putnam county; the Hon. Thomas M. Shaw, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilkin

On August 3,1892, judgment by confession was entered in the circuit court of Putnam countjr, in vacation, against Philip R. Bohlen, in favor of appellant, George I. Whitney, for $15,600 and costs, upon the following note:

“January 17,1884-
“Five years after date I promise to pay to the order of -Jake Hill, $10,000, without defalcation, value received, with interest from date; and I do hereby empower any attorney of any court of record, within the United States or elsewhere, to appear for me and confess judgment against me as “of any term for above sum, with costs of suit,” etc.

Which was signed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Keith v. KelloggIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Tucker v. GillIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Graves v. WhitneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Stankovich v. LehmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  2. Mayer v. PickIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Moyses v. SchendorfIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Miller v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Genden v. BailenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API