Legal Opinion

Kothmann & Kothmann, Inc. v. Trinity Industries, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided September 20, 2002No. CIV.A.H-01-2668PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW DENYING KKI’S APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

ROSENTHAL, District Judge.

In this patent infringement case, plaintiff, Kothmann & Kothmann, Inc. (“KKI”), seeks a preliminary injunction prohibiting defendant, Trinity Industries, Inc. (“Trinity”), from manufacturing or selling two highway safety devices. KKI alleges that these devices infringe its patent, United States Patent No. 6,022,003. (Docket Entry No. 3). Trinity asserts that KKI has not shown a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits because it has not made a clear showing that…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  4. Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Renishaw Plc v. Marposs Societa' Per Azioni and Marposs CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gyrodata Inc. v. Gyro Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API