Streiff v. Darlington
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
The appellants, in a complaint to recover a deficiency upon a note originally secured by a deed of trust, pleaded facts which were challenged by a demurrer on both general and special grounds. The demurrer was sustained with leave to amend. Choosing to stand upon their complaint, the appellants continue to urge its sufficiency upon their appeal from the judgment against them subsequently entered.
The complaint alleges these facts: Appellants were the payees of a note made by the respondents under date of July 20, 1929, for the principal sum of $20,000. This note was due two years after date…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Herbert Kraft Co. v. BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Carpenter v. SmallpageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- San Mateo County Bank v. DupretCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Shafer v. GregoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by16 opinions
- Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Cornelison v. KornbluthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Sumitomo Bank v. Taurus Developers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Jones v. Sacramento Sav. & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Brown v. CoppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.