Legal Opinion

Gooderham & Worts, Ltd. v. Collins

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 26, 1942No. Civ. 11908PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

The plaintiff, Gooderham & Worts, Ltd., sued for the refund of excise taxes paid under protest on the sale of distilled spirits. The taxes were collected by the state under the authority of the 1935 Alcoholic Beverage Control Act (Stats. 1935, p. 1123). The total amount sued for was $1694.22, but at the trial plaintiff abandoned claim to the refund of all items except $360, the amount of tax imposed and paid on the sale of 150 cases of whiskey to the Matson Navigation Company. Judgment was given for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

By the terms of section 24 of the 1935 act an excise tax was…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. American Smelting & Refining Co. v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. National Distillers Products Corp. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Rathjen Bros. v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Gooderham & Worts, Ltd. v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Tonkin Distributing Co. v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API