Legal Opinion

Rathjen Bros. v. Collins

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 1942No. Civ. 11912PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

This action was brought by Rathjen Bros., Inc., to recover deficiency excise taxes collected by the State Board of Equalization under the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. (Stats, of 1935, p. 1123, chap. 330.) The plaintiff is a duly licensed distilled spirits rectifier and distributor engaged in business in California, and, as such, for the tax period commencing July 1, 1935, to June 30, 1937, paid to the státe large sums of money under the tax statute here involved. The plaintiff operates two places of business, one in Oakland and one in San Francisco, separate books being kept for each place…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dollar Savings Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Roth Drug, Inc. v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. United States v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. State Board of Equalization v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. People v. SeymourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. American Smelting & Refining Co. v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. National Distillers Products Corp. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Gooderham & Worts, Ltd. v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Sauers Wholesale Co. v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Tonkin Distributing Co. v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API