Legal Opinion
Clark v. Crosby
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 2, 2003No. 01-12940PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COX, Circuit Judge:
Harold B. Clark appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Clark was convicted in a Florida state court of attempted first-degree murder and burglary. In his habeas petition, Clark argues that his attempted murder conviction violates the Due Process Clause and must be set aside because the jury’s general verdict may have been based on the “legally inadequate” theory of attempted felony murder. He also argues that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel. For the following reasons, we affirm the district court’s denial of Clark’s…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Cedric Eagle v. Leland LinahanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Allen v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Edward Dell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Diaz v. Secretary for the Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Eric Lynn Ferrell v. Hilton HallCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Saregama India Ltd. v. MosleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.