Legal Opinion

Watson v. Roff

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided January 7, 2022No. 2:21-cv-01622Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 7 AT SEATTLE 8 ERIC WATSON, et al., CASE NO. C21-1622 RSM 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER 10 v. 11 MIKE ROFF, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Plaintiffs Eric and Sarah Watson, proceeding pro se, filed a proposed complaint related 16 to the storage of their boat, a “rare one of a kind, 1962 Chris Craft 50 foot Constellation.” Dkt. 17 #1 at 8. Plaintiffs did not pay the filing fee at the time of filing and did not seek to proceed in 18 forma pauperis at that time.1 See Dkt. #2 (letter from the Clerk providing notice of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. In Re Digimarc Corp. Derivative LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Ingersoll Milling Machine Co. v. M/V BodenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  5. Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API