Legal Opinion

Inhabitants of Saco v. Gurney

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 1, 1852PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

This suit was brought for the penalty provided. by the Act of 1850, chap. 202, for the unlawful sale of spirituous liquors, and was pending at the passage of the Act of June 2, 1851, chap. 211. By section 18, of the Act last mentioned, the former was repealed, without any reservation or saving clause, as to actions then pending.

The right of the Legislature to repeal the Act without a saving clause is indisputable; nor can it be questioned, that the repeal operated as a bar to the further prosecution of all suits pending under that Act. It took from the Courts their power and' jurisdiction,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Yeaton and Others, of the Schooner General Pinkney and Cargo v. The United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  2. United States v. PrestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Doss v. Board of Com'rs of Mermentau Levee Dist.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  2. American Railroad Co. v. HernándezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1905
  3. County of Thurston v. ScammellWashington Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API