County of Thurston v. Scammell
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Thurston Coirnty.
1Opinion of the Court
*95The opinion of the court was delivered by
Anders, J.
These actions were brought by the county, under the revenue act of 1891 (Laws, 1891, p. 280), for the purposes of having the registered unpaid taxes on certain real estate described in the complaint declared a lien thereon and the property sold to satisfy the same. An answer was filed in one of the cases and a general demurrer in the other, but before trial or decision was had in either case the law upon which the proceedings were based was repealed by the act of March 15, 1893 (Laws, 1893, p. 323), which made no reference to pending cases…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hornthall v. CollectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Inglee v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
- McIver v. WattlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Mazange v. SlocumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
- Hunt v. JenningsIndiana Supreme Court · 1839
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Scott Fetzer Co. v. WeeksWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Anderson v. Gold Seal Vineyards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
- Beckman v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- HOUSING AUTHOR. OF CITY OF EVERETT v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Kalich v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.